The House

What Initial
House
actually is.

A platform built on the premise that the fashion industry's infrastructure problem is also a credit problem.

Independent designers have always made the work that moves culture. They have rarely had the infrastructure to be seen doing it — and when they have accessed that infrastructure, it has often come at the cost of their authorship. Initial House exists to change that exchange. We provide the platform, the show, the press access, and the industry relationships. Designers keep their name on everything they make.

A
67.5%
Designer Commission
Every sale. Every time. Non-negotiable and written into every contract from day one.
100%
Credit Retained
Authorship belongs to its maker. Initial House does not claim co-authorship of any work it presents.
2
Collections to Date
The Uncertainty Project (SS27) and Born to Die (FW27). Each governed by the same principles.
0
Compromises on Credit
The governance framework is the product. There are no exceptions, no negotiated carve-outs.
01 — What We Are
A fashion house where the house serves the designer.

Initial House is a governance-led creative fashion house and platform for independent designers. The word governance-led is doing real work in that sentence. It means the structure of the house — how credit is assigned, how commission is split, how authorship is protected — is not a policy we wrote after the fact. It is the founding premise. The platform exists to enforce it.

The model works like this: designers apply via open call to interpret a shared narrative brief. Initial House provides the show, the press infrastructure, the buyer relationships, and the production support. Designers retain full creative credit and 67.5% commission on all sales. They are not employees. They are not licensees. They are independent artists given access to a stage that was built specifically to hold their work without extracting ownership of it.

We operate as curators and creative directors, not as owners of the work we present. That distinction is the entire point.

Principle 01
Credit is non-negotiable
Authorship belongs to its maker, always. No exceptions, no co-authorship claims, no ambiguity in public-facing attribution. The designer's name goes on the work. Every time.
Principle 02
Infrastructure is the offering
The platform, the show, the press access, the buyer relationships — this is what Initial House provides. The creative work belongs to the people who made it.
Principle 03
Narrative before product
Every collection begins with a shared brief. Designers respond to a concept, not a commercial brief. The work earns its place through creative rigour, not market fit.
Principle 04
Commission reflects reality
67.5% to the designer, always. The split is fixed, transparent, and non-negotiable. Initial House takes 32.5% to cover platform, production, and show costs. Nothing else is taken.
Principle 05
Accountability runs both ways
The governance framework protects designers. It also requires them. Deadlines, deliverables, and production timelines are contractual. The platform is only as strong as what it presents.
Principle 06
Ambition is institutional
Initial House is building toward an independent institution — its own calendar, its own categories, its own pipeline. The current model is the foundation, not the ceiling.
02 — How It Works
The model in plain terms.

Each collection cycle begins with a narrative brief developed by the Creative Director. The brief is a concept — a question, a tension, a set of constraints — not a commercial direction. Designers apply via open call to interpret it through their own practice.

Stage
Initial House provides
Designer provides
Open Call
Narrative Brief + Platform The collection concept, application infrastructure, and selection process. Curation is by craft category and brief fit.
Portfolio + Brief Response A portfolio and written response to the brief. No fees to apply. Selection is merit-based.
Production
Timeline + Support Production schedule, check-ins, fabric stipend (where applicable), and logistical coordination.
The Work One completed look, delivered on the agreed timeline. Full creative autonomy within the brief's framework.
Showcase
Venue + Press + Buyers Show production, press invitations, buyer access, photography, and all public-facing presentation.
Presence Attendance where possible. The designer's work is attributed and presented under their name in all materials.
Sales
32.5% Platform Fee Covers platform infrastructure, show costs, press, and ongoing operational costs. Fixed. Transparent.
67.5% Commission Paid to the designer on all sales. No deductions, no additional fees, no negotiation.
CB
Caitlyn Bray — Creative Director
Creative Director & Founder

Caitlyn
Bray

Caitlyn Bray founded Initial House out of a specific frustration: that the fashion industry had built its infrastructure around extracting ownership from the people whose work made that infrastructure worth having. She holds a BFA in Fashion Design and a BS in Fashion Merchandising from Kent State University, with runway experience at Elie Saab in Paris, and is currently completing an MA in Fashion Entrepreneurship & Innovation at London College of Fashion, UAL. Initial House is the institution she built to solve the problem she kept seeing — not as a critique, but as a working alternative.

Role Founder & Creative Director
Formation BFA Fashion Design · Kent State University
Formation BS Fashion Merchandising · Kent State University
Experience Elie Saab — Paris Runway
Current MA Fashion Entrepreneurship & Innovation · LCF UAL
Contact initialhouseih@gmail.com

Where this
is going.

Initial House is building toward independence at institutional scale — its own place on the fashion calendar, its own categories, its own emerging talent pipeline that runs parallel to, not underneath, the existing system. The current model is the proof of concept. The Uncertainty Project established the governance framework in practice. Born to Die establishes the show ambition.

The long-term goal is an institution that operates on its own terms — one that has demonstrated, season by season, that protecting designer authorship and running a credible fashion platform are not in tension with each other. They are the same project.

I